[64studio-devel] Apt Question

Susan Dridi sdridi at greens.org
Fri May 25 22:55:25 UTC 2007


Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> |--==> Daniel James writes:
> 
>   DJ> Hi Susan,
>   >>currently, there is nothing in my sources.list
>   >>file, other than comments.
> 
>   DJ> That's right, we use the 64studio.list file so that we can automate 
>   DJ> updates to our repositories, leaving your own sources.list file alone.
> 
>   >>And I haven't been able to upgrade, even
>   >>though I've wanted to.
> 
>   DJ> If you have this line uncommented:
> 
>   >># Bleeding edge 64 Studio repository, only for testers!
>   >>deb http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/testing/ 64studio main
> 
>   DJ> then run:
> 
>   DJ> apt-get update
>   DJ> apt-get dist-upgrade
>   DJ> 64studio-config new
> 
>   DJ> you'll be as upgraded as it's possible to be :-)
> 
> If you want you can also run:
> 
> tasksel --new-install
> 
> to pull in new packages.
> 
> Ciao!
> 
> Free

Hi All,

Thanks for all the responses.

I had the testing line uncommented, did the usual:

apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade

didn't know about the 64studio-config new command, thanks.

The problem was the the 64studio package was being held back because 
realtime-lsm was installed. The odd thing is that when I used Debian, it 
would tell me if a package needed to be removed when I did an upgrade. 
This just failed. Later, I went into synaptic, and I'm sorry, I don't 
remember exactly what I did. But removing realtime-lsm allowed the upgrade.

I am pretty sure, for example, that Ardour wasn't upgraded until I 
removed realtime-lsm. But, I wasn't keeping notes, sorry.

Bad tester:( I will try to be more diligent!

I suppose that means that if there's been a kernel upgrade since 1.30, 
then I'll have to upgrade my kernel? The dist-upgrade didn't do that, is 
that correct?

susan at 64studio:~$ uname -a
Linux 64studio 2.6.19-1-multimedia-amd64 #2 SMP PREEMPT Sun Apr 29 
13:56:49 UTC 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'll try tasksel later, as I see you've added some new packages. The 
tuner sounds interesting, I have one, of course, but this seems more 
convenient, and I can just leave my tuner in my not-yet-gigging bag:-)

Okay, off to practice my bass, wouldn't want to blame the software for 
something that was my fault! :-)

Take care,

-Susan




More information about the 64studio-devel mailing list