[64studio-devel] Apt Repo

[Steve A]

it was working fine last night, so probably not too serious a problem.

s~


>From: Quentin Harley <qharley at wbs.co.za>
>To: Christian Muise <christian.muise at gmail.com>
>CC: 64 Studio <64studio-devel at 64studio.com>
>Subject: Re: [64studio-devel] Apt Repo
>Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:29:40 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from bigben2.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.81.132]) by 
>bay0-mc4-f12.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Thu, 
>24 May 2007 12:33:16 -0700
>Received: from 64studio.dh.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.80.158] 
>helo=64studio.com)by bigben2.bytemark.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52)id 
>1HrJ3j-0004fC-5m; Thu, 24 May 2007 19:33:15 +0000
>Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=64studio.com)by 64studio.com 
>with esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from 
><64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com>)id 1HrJ1q-0002ST-Ss; Thu, 24 May 2007 
>19:31:18 +0000
>Received: from mail-03.jhb.wbs.co.za ([196.2.97.2])by 64studio.com with 
>esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from <qharley at wbs.co.za>)id 1HrJ1m-0002SM-NI; 
>Thu, 24 May 2007 19:31:16 +0000
>Received: from mail-02.jhb.wbs.co.za ([196.30.31.197])by 
>mail-03.jhb.wbs.co.za with ESMTP; 24 May 2007 21:33:06 +0200
>Received: from wbs-196-2-108-164.wbs.co.za ([196.2.108.164] 
>helo=[127.0.0.1])by mail-02.jhb.wbs.co.za with esmtp (Exim 
>4.63)(envelope-from <qharley at wbs.co.za>)id 1HrJ3Z-0004v1-6q; Thu, 24 May 
>2007 21:33:06 +0200
>X-Message-Info: 
>LsUYwwHHNt3jwI5ppmUEATTJ6bTCi5Mn72wbaQUwGGjT1VRm0Tun68jQgsQf1qPG
>X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
>X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJSEVUbEHh/Fh2dsb2JhbACQDgEBCQ4r
>User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
>References: <986c9c8f0705241152q788c2bffvbcfe20e045eaad56 at mail.gmail.com>
>X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000743-4, 2007/05/24), Outbound message
>X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>X-Original-Subject: Re: [64studio-devel] Apt Repo
>X-Scan-Signature: 070457ae559f5fc3fe9944ac7220026c
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 64studio.com
>X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 
>tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST autolearn=no 
>version=3.1.7-deb
>X-BeenThere: 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: 64 Studio developers and contributors mailing 
>list<64studio-devel.64studio.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel>, 
><mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel>
>List-Post: <mailto:64studio-devel at 64studio.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel>,<mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
>X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on 64studio.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Return-Path: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2007 19:33:16.0510 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[605937E0:01C79E3A]
>
>Christian Muise wrote:
> > Why is http://apt.64studio.com/64studio/testing forbidden? Did I miss
> > a message about this on the list?
>
>I just had the same thing upgrading to 1.4.0
>
>the blender package and another (cannot remember) failed - 403 forbidden...
>
>=-O
>
>Must be some finger trouble.  Hope it will be sorted out soon!
>
>Cheers,
>Quentin
>
>_______________________________________________
>64studio-devel mailing list
>64studio-devel at 64studio.com
>http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

_________________________________________________________________
More photos, more messages, more storage—get 2GB with Windows Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507