[64studio-devel] Aeolus

[Steve A]

hello,

I've noticed that Aeolus AMD64 has now made it into debian / unstable.

There is a package here:

http://packages.debian.org/unstable/sound/aeolus

thanks to whoever pushed this through.
S~

>From: Daniel James <daniel at 64studio.com>
>To: John Dey <jsdey at optonline.net>
>CC: 64Studio <64studio-devel at 64studio.com>
>Subject: Re: [64studio-devel] Aeolus
>Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 10:06:17 +0100
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from tallyho.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.81.166]) by 
>bay0-mc8-f19.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Tue, 1 
>May 2007 02:08:22 -0700
>Received: from 64studio.dh.bytemark.co.uk ([80.68.80.158] 
>helo=64studio.com)by tallyho.bytemark.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52)id 
>1HioLN-0003Dn-8S; Tue, 01 May 2007 09:08:21 +0000
>Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=64studio.com)by 64studio.com 
>with esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from 
><64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com>)id 1HioJd-0000YV-GF; Tue, 01 May 2007 
>09:06:33 +0000
>Received: from heisenberg.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.141])by 64studio.com with 
>esmtp (Exim 4.63)(envelope-from <daniel at 64studio.com>) id 
>1HioJb-0000YP-79for 64studio-devel at 64studio.com; Tue, 01 May 2007 09:06:31 
>+0000
>Received: from [82.71.98.243] (helo=[83.166.184.39])by heisenberg.zen.co.uk 
>with esmtp (Exim 4.50)id 1HioK9-0002Z2-D8; Tue, 01 May 2007 09:07:05 +0000
>X-Message-Info: 
>LsUYwwHHNt20QRGRjyTSTMW+ePFNu+gsEwFlT+0lI8puehIAR5oyBhhyM+mpExet
>User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060915)
>References: <e57f3b165797644fc562248ee6f7af4a at optonline.net>
>X-Originating-Heisenberg-IP: [82.71.98.243]
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7-deb (2006-10-05) on 64studio.com
>X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
>autolearn=ham version=3.1.7-deb
>X-BeenThere: 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
>X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
>Precedence: list
>List-Id: 64 Studio developers and contributors mailing 
>list<64studio-devel.64studio.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: 
><http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel>, 
><mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=unsubscribe>
>List-Archive: <http://lists.64studio.com/pipermail/64studio-devel>
>List-Post: <mailto:64studio-devel at 64studio.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=help>
>List-Subscribe: 
><http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel>,<mailto:64studio-devel-request at 64studio.com?subject=subscribe>
>Errors-To: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
>X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on 64studio.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Return-Path: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 May 2007 09:08:22.0506 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[44ADFCA0:01C78BD0]
>
>Hi John,
>
> > I'm pleased to report that with Free Ekanayaka's suggestion to load
> > libjack-dev from the unstable distrubution, I now have a working
> > version of Aeolus.
>
>I'm glad to hear you got it going :-)
>
> >  If I only knew
> > how to package debian files, I would be glad to provide the file to all
> > organ enthusiasts.
>
>There are some details of the procedure here:
>
>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ap-pkg-binarypkg.html#s-pkg-bincreating
>
>In this case it isn't strictly necessary to create your own package, as
>Aeolus is already in Debian's new packages queue, and should turn up in
>the unstable distribution soon. Our policy is to get packages into
>official Debian whenever possible, as they get more widely tested that way.
>
>Cheers!
>
>Daniel
>
>_______________________________________________
>64studio-devel mailing list
>64studio-devel at 64studio.com
>http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

_________________________________________________________________
Catch suspicious messages before you open them—with Windows Live Hotmail. 
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_protection_0507