[64studio-devel] [64 Studio] #287: Possible kernel regression with high jackd sample rates in 32-bit version
Free Ekanayaka
free at 64studio.com
Tue Jun 12 12:52:14 UTC 2007
Hi all,
|--==> Daniel James writes:
DJ> Hi Dick,
>>I have just run a comparison of loading using Ardour using various
>>versions on my hardware. I played back a four-channel recording with
>>three effect at 44.1 k and 128 sample buffer, 5.8 milliseconds delay. On
>>DeMudi it used 33% processor and on 64Studio 1.4, kernel 2.6.19 it uses
>>58% and similar with 2..6.19.
DJ> Thanks for running these tests! My best guess is that the DeMuDi kernel
DJ> had some optimisation for 32-bit CPUs that we aren't using in our 32-bit
DJ> build. Either that, or the 2.6 kernel just isn't as efficient as the 2.4
DJ> kernel, assuming you are running 2.4 on DeMuDi - this seems much less
DJ> likely though.
AFAIR demudi kernels had no particular CPU optimisation enabled.
Ciao!
Free
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list