[64studio-devel] IRQ-23 process
Frieder Bürzele
linux-stuff at arcor.de
Sun Jun 10 21:09:27 UTC 2007
Steve A wrote:
> hello Lee
>
> Thanks for the pointer to help trace the problem!
>
>
> tux at 64studio:~$ cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0
> 0: 201 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 7: 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
> 8: 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
> 12: 9134 IO-APIC-edge i8042
> 15: 3412 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> 18: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ICE1712
> 19: 3 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci1394
> 20: 7056 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 21: 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
> 22: 3 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, NVidia CK804
> 23: 2638656 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci_hcd:usb1, eth1
> NMI: 0
> LOC: 395083
> ERR: 0
>
> I've rebooted a few times, and it appears that the IRQ associated with
> eth1 (either 23 or 21) is always 3% CPU busy. Sometimes the machine
> boots with eth1 on its own interrupt, which is why I'm so sure. Also
> I'm getting no network traffic showing on the router.
>
> This does not happen with the earlier Kernel 2.16.19.1
>
> I'm out of my depth now, I'll create a ticket because I can create
> this every time, and it is new for this kernel.
>
We had the same problem with ingo already released a fix for testing:
quoted from our ml:
<snip>
>
> Thanks again. I reported it with a copy to Ingo and got a patch back
> that fixes the issue. I don't know if this will result in a change to
> rt-sources down the road. (I'm not that smart.) Anyway, it's in the
> forcedeth.c driver should the question come up. Here's the patch I
> applied:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/testing/forcedeth-rt-tweak.patch
>
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
greetz Frieder (gentoo proaudio)
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list