[64studio-devel] [64 Studio] #131: Help package FreeBoB for Debian
joel silvestre
j.silvestre at wanadoo.fr
Wed Feb 14 12:28:44 UTC 2007
Le vendredi 19 janvier 2007 à 17:53 +0000, 64 Studio a écrit :
> #131: Help package FreeBoB for Debian
> ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> Reporter: daniel | Owner: free
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Priority: high | Milestone: 2.0
> Component: packages | Version:
> Severity: normal | Resolution:
> Keywords: freebob firewire |
> ------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
> Comment (by free at 64studio.com):
>
> For this we probably need a tester with the proper hardware.. anyone
> willing to have a go?
>
> _______________________________________________
> 64studio-devel mailing list
> 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
> http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
Hi,
Found on the freebob-devel mailing list :
Cheers,
Joel
Jonathan Murphy wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm just wondering if the problem related to complete preemption has
> been fixed yet?
It is fixed as from 2.6.20-rc6-rt2. This means that the upcoming 2.6.20
with -rt patches will work fine.
What you also can do is apply the attached patch to an earlier kernel
(-rt patch it first). If it applies (probably with some offsets &
fuzz),
the issue should be solved.
Pieter
pièce jointe
différences entre
fichiers
(kernel-2.6.19-rrt-deadlock-fix.patch)
Index: linux/include/linux/interrupt.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ linux/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -328,10 +328,8 @@ static inline void tasklet_unlock(struct
clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state);
}
-static inline void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
-{
- while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) { barrier(); }
-}
+extern void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t);
+
#else
# define tasklet_trylock(t) 1
# define tasklet_tryunlock(t) 1
Index: linux/kernel/softirq.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/softirq.c
+++ linux/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/notifier.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
@@ -656,6 +657,25 @@ void __init softirq_init(void)
open_softirq(HI_SOFTIRQ, tasklet_hi_action, NULL);
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
+
+void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
+{
+ while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &(t)->state)) {
+ /*
+ * Hack for now to avoid this busy-loop:
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+ msleep(1);
+#else
+ barrier();
+#endif
+ }
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_unlock_wait);
+
+#endif
+
static int ksoftirqd(void * __data)
{
struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority =
MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 };
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list