[64studio-devel] [64 Studio] #365: 2.6.22 kernel upgrade breaks nvidia xorg

[Free Ekanayaka]

Hi Steve,

|--==> Steve A writes:

  SA> OK thanks, got it installed.
  SA> I still have a problem, because I can't do an apt-get update.

  SA> It looks like my system is expecting a signed key.

  SA> W: GPG error: http://apt.64studio.com etch Release: The following
  SA> signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1CC1348879ADCDD1 APT Archive from 64
  SA> Studio <apt at 64studio.com>
  SA> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems

  SA> I think I have screwed a local setting, how can I reset things and
  SA> rebuild the local key list?

I'm not sure what's wrong with your system, anyway you should be able
to re-import the key by running:

dpkg --reconfigure 64studio-apt

or

apt-get install --reinstall 64studio-apt

Ciao!

Free

  >>From: Free Ekanayaka <free at 64studio.com>
  >>To: "Steve A" <parkland99 at hotmail.com>
  >>CC: 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
  >>Subject: Re: [64 Studio] #365: 2.6.22 kernel upgrade breaks nvidia xorg
  >>Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:25:55 +0200
  >>MIME-Version: 1.0
  >>Received: from serverina.hacknight.org ([80.68.90.101]) by
  >>bay0-mc3-f21.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668);
  >>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 06:26:02 -0700
  >>Received: from 64studio (host52-6.pool80183.interbusiness.it
  >>[80.183.6.52])by serverina.hacknight.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id
  >>552C2140CE;Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:25:59 +0100 (BST)
  >>X-Message-Info:
  >>JGTYoYF78jEHjJx36Oi8+Z3TmmkSEdPt3Mi6GgUSv7yYKHQgGfDe+2wCW4LegkYQqypIHu4uP4o=
  >>Organization: 64 Studio
  >>References: <BAY119-F1842511DEF2D47FC2DD344C0E20 at phx.gbl>
  >>User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux)
  >>Return-Path: free at 64studio.com
  >>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2007 13:26:02.0921 (UTC)
  >>FILETIME=[29F09990:01C7DC1B]
  >>
  >>Hi Steve,
  >>
  >>the backport repo is not signed, you should be able to use apt-get
  >>install by answering "yes" to the question about security..
  >>
  >>Ciao!
  >>
  >>Free
  >>
  >>|--==> Steve A writes:
  >>
  SA> Thanks Free!  That has fixed it.
  SA> However,
  >>
  SA> I have a new problem,
  >>
  SA> I can't do a apt-get update with backports enabled:
  >>
  SA> W: GPG error: http://apt.64studio.com etch Release: The following
  SA> signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1CC1348879ADCDD1 APT Archive from 64
  SA> Studio <apt at 64studio.com>
  >>
  SA> I may have screwed-up something here because I interrupted an
  >>aptitude
  SA> update.
  >>
  SA> Is this a genuine problem with the repository, or do I have to reset
  SA> keys locally?
  >>
  SA> _________________________________________________________________
  SA> Booking a flight? Know when to buy with airfare predictions on MSN
  SA> 
  >>Travel. http://travel.msn.com/Articles/aboutfarecast.aspx&ocid=T001MSN25A07001

  SA> _________________________________________________________________
  SA> See what youre getting intobefore you go there
  SA> http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507