[64studio-devel] 0.9.5 is out
Quentin Harley
qharley at wbs.co.za
Tue Oct 24 20:43:03 UTC 2006
This is the way we learn...
Do you know what the original motivation for the high res timers were? I'd
like to know out of curiosity sake.
Thanks for the feedback
Quentin
-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Revell [mailto:rlrevell at joe-job.com]
Sent: 24 October 2006 15:50
To: Quentin Harley
Cc: 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
Subject: RE: [64studio-devel] 0.9.5 is out
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 08:52 +0200, Quentin Harley wrote:
> High res should be a selectable feature, if it is not standard.
>
> High res timers has been working fine on my system, and I even saw some
(be
> it psychological) improvement on low latency handling for live work. Less
> xruns for the heavy stuff.
>
High res timers have nothing to do with xruns. The effect is certainly
psychological.
> We should not let all users be tied down to make the distro "standard".
> I know of a big Seattle-based software company that does just that.
>
> Is it possible to let the installer check the CPU and install the relevant
> kernel?
>
There's a big difference between tying everyone down and shipping an
experimental unstable feature.
There's no way to know a priori whether high res timers will work on a
given system, there are so many that have buggy LAPIC and other issues.
> Regards,
> Quentin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com
> [mailto:64studio-devel-bounces at 64studio.com] On Behalf Of Lee Revell
> Sent: 24 October 2006 02:39
> To: joel silvestre
> Cc: 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
> Subject: Re: [64studio-devel] 0.9.5 is out
>
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 02:11 +0200, joel silvestre wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The new 2.6.18 kernel doesn't boot on my Intel core duo laptop.
> > So I reinstall 64studio 0.94 and upgrade to 0.95 from the CD with
> > synaptic.
> > Is it a good or a bad idea?
> >
> > Jackd -V returns 0.100.0 and synaptic says 0.101.1-1.64studio is
> > installed. Where is the truth?
> >
> > Are the 2.6.18 kernel sources available? I think the kernel hang because
> > of the timer. Disabling both hpet and hrt should help as it does for a
> > vanilla 2.6.18-rt7.
>
> Does the 0.9.5 kernel enable high res timers? I don't think it should.
> It's too new and experimental a feature.
>
> Lee
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 64studio-devel mailing list
> 64studio-devel at 64studio.com
> http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel
>
>
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list