[64studio-devel] Re: 0.9.5
Daniel James
daniel at 64studio.com
Sun Oct 15 20:54:57 UTC 2006
Hi Quentin,
> I am getting some xruns during
> "mastering"!
It's worth bearing in mind that digital mastering is a high latency
operation, because of the heavy DSP going on, compared to tracking. So
there's no problem with increasing your Jack frames per period while
running Jamin - that should sort your xruns out, unless you've got a
hardware problem (or it's that pesky dual-core Jack bug again).
> I am using a pair of passive monitors in a not so ideal room to mix (and
> almost master) the stuff I record.
Passive monitors aren't necessarily bad, as long as the amp is good
quality and well matched to the speakers; a lot of top mastering
engineers use large hi-fi speakers, like B&W Nautilus, in preference to
active nearfield monitors of the kind often used for tracking these days.
Small nearfields like the Rogers LS3/5A were originally designed for
outside broadcast vans where space was restricted, not low-end response,
and the classic studios of the past generally used large passive Tannoy
monitors for mixing and mastering.
Then people started using nearfields like the Yamaha NS-10 or Auratone
to figure out what the mix would sound like on a crappy 'hi-fi' with a
limited frequency response, not as their main mix reference. The big
studios that are left still benefit from full-size Urei or Tannoy
monitors, even if they have a pair of active nearfields on the top of
the meterbridge.
> Does Linux have a room (venue)
> compensation project where you could use a pink noise source to
> automatically program Jamin (or related Jack plugin) to "Fix" the room?
Yes, it's at:
http://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/
However the subject is controversial. What I've heard is that room
correction only really works at low frequencies, but then again, those
frequencies are the hardest to treat in small rooms.
I would recommend reading some of the DIY room treatment articles on
http://www.soundonsound.com/ - look for 'Studio SOS'.
You can do quite a lot with DIY methods - the main thing to watch out
for is that you don't just absorb the high frequencies. Carpet or thin,
low-density acoustic foam tiles on the walls are the worst culprit for
that. You end up with a room which subjectively sounds 'dead', but in
fact you've created a really uneven frequency response in the room,
probably with a couple of big resonant peaks left in the bass response.
The first purpose-built studio I rented was just like that - the
frequency response in my living room at home was more even :-)
You can get a low-cost test CD with some frequency sweeps on it, or make
your own test track by sequencing something like zynaddsubfx to sweep up
the scale. You'll soon hear if any frequencies are coming back much
louder than the others. Then you'll know which frequencies need the most
attention.
You'll probably also need to cut down on reflections, to make the stereo
image clearer. Just changing the room layout and your position relative
to the speakers can make a big difference there. Sofas can make good
bass traps too ;-)
Cheers!
Daniel
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list