[64studio-devel] [Fwd: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt0, -rt YUM repository]

Lee Revell rlrevell at joe-job.com
Fri Nov 17 23:12:43 UTC 2006


On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 22:58 +0000, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Lee,
> 
> > Fix will also be in 2.6.19-rc*-rt3, but it might be easier for the user
> > to try the small patch below.
> 
> Thanks! Free was planning to build a new kernel package, so I guess we 
> should go for rt3 now.
> 
> I know it's hard to guess, but would you say the stable release of 
> 2.6.19 is likely to be soon? Otherwise we might use 2.6.17 in our 1.0 
> release; it works well for most people.

Well, this patch will only help with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y, which I
strongly advise you not to enable in your kernel ;-)

Also I notice your kernel configs have CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACE set.  You
probably want to disable that.

There are 5 or 6 regressions that the kernel guys need to fix before
2.6.19.  I think it should be released soon, but if 2.6.17 is working
for most of your users, I'd consider releasing that.  I doubt 2.6.19-rt
will be immediately stable enough for your 1.0 release anyway.

What's your target release date?

Lee




More information about the 64studio-devel mailing list