[64studio-devel] [Fwd: Re: 2.6.19-rc6-rt0, -rt YUM repository]
Lee Revell
rlrevell at joe-job.com
Fri Nov 17 23:12:43 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 22:58 +0000, Daniel James wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> > Fix will also be in 2.6.19-rc*-rt3, but it might be easier for the user
> > to try the small patch below.
>
> Thanks! Free was planning to build a new kernel package, so I guess we
> should go for rt3 now.
>
> I know it's hard to guess, but would you say the stable release of
> 2.6.19 is likely to be soon? Otherwise we might use 2.6.17 in our 1.0
> release; it works well for most people.
Well, this patch will only help with CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y, which I
strongly advise you not to enable in your kernel ;-)
Also I notice your kernel configs have CONFIG_PREEMPT_TRACE set. You
probably want to disable that.
There are 5 or 6 regressions that the kernel guys need to fix before
2.6.19. I think it should be released soon, but if 2.6.17 is working
for most of your users, I'd consider releasing that. I doubt 2.6.19-rt
will be immediately stable enough for your 1.0 release anyway.
What's your target release date?
Lee
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list