[64studio-devel] 0.9.5 is out
joel silvestre
j.silvestre at wanadoo.fr
Wed Nov 8 00:21:27 UTC 2006
Le mardi 07 novembre 2006 à 13:58 +0000, Daniel James a écrit :
>
> This may be the problem - some essential step has been missed. What does
> mdadm report in dmesg?
>
Hi Daniel,
Here's the dmesg lines related to mdadm:
raid5: automatically using best checksumming function: generic_sse
generic_sse: 5748.000 MB/sec
raid5: using function: generic_sse (5748.000 MB/sec)
md: md driver 0.90.3 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
md: bitmap version 4.39
raid6: int64x1 1621 MB/s
raid6: int64x2 1980 MB/s
raid6: int64x4 2105 MB/s
raid6: int64x8 1472 MB/s
raid6: sse2x1 675 MB/s
raid6: sse2x2 1015 MB/s
raid6: sse2x4 1363 MB/s
raid6: using algorithm sse2x4 (1363 MB/s)
md: raid6 personality registered for level 6
md: raid5 personality registered for level 5
md: raid4 personality registered for level 4
md: md0 stopped.
md: bind<hdf>
md: bind<hdg>
md: bind<hdh>
md: bind<hde>
raid5: device hde operational as raid disk 0
raid5: device hdh operational as raid disk 3
raid5: device hdg operational as raid disk 2
raid5: device hdf operational as raid disk 1
raid5: allocated 4276kB for md0
raid5: raid level 5 set md0 active with 4 out of 4 devices, algorithm 2
RAID5 conf printout:
--- rd:4 wd:4 fd:0
disk 0, o:1, dev:hde
disk 1, o:1, dev:hdf
disk 2, o:1, dev:hdg
disk 3, o:1, dev:hdh
If a fresh install can solve the problem, I can do it. And it will be a
good test for the next 64studio release!
Cheers,
joël
More information about the 64studio-devel
mailing list